Rule Chains in Rules Engine
None
When creating rules, it would be great to be able to put them in a Rule Chain from the rule itself instead of having to go back to the repository and create a rule chain.
Also, I'd like to be able to see from the Rules Engine that a rule is a part of a rule chain. Below is a screenshot of a rule in the Rules Engine Repository that is a part of a rule chain, but there is nothing indicating it is a part of a Rule chain:
Also, I'd like to be able to see from the Rules Engine that a rule is a part of a rule chain. Below is a screenshot of a rule in the Rules Engine Repository that is a part of a rule chain, but there is nothing indicating it is a part of a Rule chain:
Sign up
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Welcome to the Gainsight Community
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Great feedback on adding the rule to a chain as a step.
Scott - Added the search option into backlog.
I have another rule that is loading data to create user health scores and I basically have a "reset everything" rule that could be used twice if available.
reg running rules at higher frequency:
We are working towards it in multi-step. First step would be rule chains(done) and then parallel run of rule chains and as final step we would enable increasing the frequency of the rules.
Some background on why rules are not allowed to run at higher frequency:
As you know all the rules (for each customer) would run in a sequence defined by the scheduled time. This is essential and it causes the total time taken to complete all the rules anywhere from 1-8 hours. The long running rules for most customers is influenced by the SFDC API response time majorly among other reasons, and thats not within Gainsight's control. By increasing the frequency of rules this will increase to unmanageable levels (greater than 24hrs).
Why doesn't the rules run in parallel now?
We can't have the rules read / write into the same object and if we have to support then heavy instrumentation should be done in Gainsight's platform which is the second enhancement I mentioned above.
The roadmap would look like this
I agree with the next run datetime part, it would be useful to show that.
This would be FANTASTIC. Less clicks, easy.