When you have modified a rule's Advanced Logic (to be something like "A and B and (C or D)" and then you add another field to the filter the logic just results back to "A and B and C and D and E". And then I spend then next 5 minutes trying to figure out what the heck happened... and then remember it's the logic and spend the next 5 minutes trying to remember what it was!
My suggestion is that the logic just remain as it is and maybe do a highlight to remind me to update it when I add a field. Or add the new field to the end like "A and B and (C or D) and E." Either works for me!
Rule logic needs to be maintained
CS Rules & Permissions
Sign up
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Welcome to the Gainsight Community
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Luis, Thanks for the share, it is a good insight. On a lighter note, "I was born intelligent but education ruined me". All software engineers are taught ((A and 😎 or C) as the way to represent logical condition instead of simple English (Any and All)
This will addressed in August / Setember in Rules Engine by adding "AND" condition instead of entire reset.
Advanced logic on Copilot Powelist creation is now resilient to new filters added and removed. Similar support will be extended to Rules advanced logic too.