What Makes A Good CTA ?


Badge

A new system Gainsight, wonderful.   A new way to work proactively, instead of reactively.
  

What are these Call To Actions (CTAs)?  

Within the tool, there is an easy way to create an action (task) based on some activity that has occurred or some situation that exists or perhaps there is just some periodic task that should be scheduled. The next bit of information is going to assume the reader is aware of the CTA feature, in general.

So what makes a “good CTA?”  
Without using the canned answer of “it depends”, let me share a couple suggestions around a few specific pieces of a CTA;  title, status, priority, type, etc. First of all, don’t just create a CTA because you can.   CTAs are easy to create, but one should make sure the CTA has an action that can be taken – hence the name “call to action”. Make sure you are creating a CTA, that has a task or set of tasks that should be completed by the assignee. Creating a CTA, just for awareness, can be valuable, but may end up being clutter in a CSM cockpit.  

CTA Title

Be specific as possible and to the point. There is limited space in the Cockpit when viewing the CTAs, so be cognizant.  

CTA Comment

Provide guidance and reminders to the reader as to the purpose and meaning of the CTA.  Point to specific objects, such as opportunities, cases, or contacts if the CTA is related to any of these items. Add pointers to process documentation as to how to process the CTA or help notes that gives the assignee reminders of how to best complete the CTA.

CTA Priority

Since this data field can be used for filtering within the Cockpit, be smart about the priorities for each and every CTA generated. Perhaps keep a list or document of all the CTAs possible and make sure as you add more CTAs to the system, the priority of each CTA is consistent with other CTAs at that same priority.

CTA Type

The main 3 or 4 general ones out of the box work well.  You may want to create a new type (category), especially if you want the CSMs to be able to sort on a specific class or special type of CTA.

CTA Status

Take a step back and walk into the future a little. Think about the CTA reports you want created in 6 or 12 or 18 months. You may want to add CTA statuses to segregate or segment at a later date. For example, CTA was closed but ineffective, CTA was closed but unsuccessful. CTA was closed, no customer response. You can have your own meanings of the word unsuccessful or ineffective.  Also, while the CTA is “in progress”, you will most likely want more statuses, like “Waiting on Customer”, “Waiting on Support”, etc.

CTA Owner   

Don’t forget CSMs are not the only people that can be CTA owners; it may make sense to create CTAs for Account Managers or Execs, for example.

CTA Due Date  

Think about this one a bit too. When should the CTA be due ? The CSMs are most likely going to use this data field to sort through “what to work on next” in the Cockpit. Give the CTA enough time to be
completed.  Run some periodic reports during a time period. Is a particular CTA always being completed after the Due Date?  Or always being competed 3 days before its due? Then, you might want to adjust the Due Date when the CTA is generated.

There is plenty more items to think about around CTAs.  Please feel free to ping me of any questions or if you want to go further around discussing CTA generation.






 


14 replies

Userlevel 7
Badge +2
Hi Tom - this is a great perspective from an experienced Gainsight admin! Thanks for sharing these awesome tips and ideas!
Badge
Tom, this is an extremely insightful post! As a CSM using Cockpit, I find all of your suggestions and recommendations on how to think through what can seem to be a simple concept, spot on. 
Awesome summary!
Great overview!
I love the descriptions of each component. I have copied this and pasted it into our training deck! Thanks!!
Badge
Just saw this and wanted to say that's an awesome summary! Thank you for posting this!
Badge
Simple and amazingly written, loved it!!!
Userlevel 7
Badge +11

Love this! Great overview. 

Badge

Very helpful!

Userlevel 6
Badge +8

Do many people utilize a “Waiting on customer” status? Any best practices to be aware of when adding new statuses like this?

Do many people utilize a “Waiting on customer” status? Any best practices to be aware of when adding new statuses like this?

I would be very interested to hear the answer to this! I have been wondering myself if it actually adds value, or just another drop down to choose from!

This is a great read, thank you for posting! We are in the process of designing our CTAs currently and our concern is that the CSMs will get overwhelmed by the number of CTAs coming in for their accounts, which will hamper adoption. If anyone has any tips on how to help facilitate the adoption of CTAs for new users, any thoughts are greatly appreciated!

Userlevel 7
Badge +9

@Iana - Good luck. We’ve all been there. My best practices are to

  • Ease into CTAs, especially if the CSM team is new to CTAs. It’s very easy to flood the CSM with CTAs, which decreases their value. Focus and targeting with respect to CTAs go a long way. Find 3-5 CTAs that you think might work. Chances are a few will get results, and a few won’t. So…
  • Don’t be afraid to change course on CTAs. If you’re not getting the outcomes you want, stop the CTA, or refine the criteria that fire it, or refine the Playbook. (Or…..check that your CSM team understands what the CTA is about and how to action it, which is different type of issue altogether.) Your CSM team will be very aware very quickly of which CTAs are getting results and which are not.
  • Make CTAs a system of action. I don’t especially favor informational or “anniversary” CTAs; focus on action and change rather than awareness.
  • A common question I pose when CTA requests arrive: How will this CTA change a customer’s behavior or contribute to a customer’s success? If that answer comes back vague, I encourage the requestor to do a bit more homework.
  • Speaking of action, I do favor Playbooks for CTAs, but I recommend a maximum of 3-5 Tasks per playbook. Any more than that, and the CSMs can complain of Gainsight becoming a box-checking bore rather than a helpful system of customer engagement.

 

Thank you so much, @matthew_lind, for sharing your experience! This is great advice - we will review our CTA list and narrow it down to a few actionable alerts for the initial launch phase. We are also working on Playbooks in parallel. It is certainly a lot to think through! 

Reply