CS Product Ideas
Submit product suggestions
- 284 Posts
- 25,353 Replies
Hi Team, The incorrect number of records is displayed for any report against an SFDC object that contains at least one group by (if there are more records retrieved than the “Show Limit” for the UI page). For example, there are 412 records, and I have selected to show 100 records per page, then “100" will be displayed for 4 pages, and 12 displayed for the last page.One suggestion is to remove the "Total Number of Records:" and "Click Here" for SFDC API queries that cannot return the correct number of records.https://share.getcloudapp.com/JrunDADE
In DD if we add new field in fetch task,will get popup to add it in following tasks.If we provide similar functionality in Rule engine it will save time for GS Admins.With the current functionality,if we want to remove the field in fetch task ,we would need to remove all the down stream tasks.So customers excepting remove field from all the tasks with once click.
When sending NPS survey programs, we sometime get requests from customers to have a survey send to someone else. It would be great if adding new participants to be able to specify which step they should start at. In this example, we would not want the new participant to get a heads up email and instead just get the survey email.
Restrict license deploymentPlanned
Is there a way to limit the licenses for customers in User Management? I do see a common use case around GS license deployment with my customers. We do not have any mechanism to restrict the customers from deploying licenses more than they have purchased. Few of the customers bought viewer licenses but deployed them as full licenses for a significant amount of time until we checked. It would be good to have a check/pop up displayed when they exceed the number of licenses they deploy and if possible - by type.
Hello Team,We’ve got a request from customer, if we can have same way of searching for Lookup fields in the reporting, even in the Token Mapping section in Playbook as well, as it would be a easy way of searching the fields.https://share.getcloudapp.com/jkuPpo0m
It would be great to have an update to allow custom status for JO programs so that we can better identify programs as “ready for QA” and “approved”. We want to have draft indicate that the process of being worked, reviewed, and approved in addition to the current statuses. These would not kick anything off, but would help with establishing a QA workflow between different team members. We limit who has the ability to publish, so this would help better organize how many programs we have in the pipeline being worked
Usecase: I have to filter out certain category of Contact types in the rule action criteria. But it is not letting me choose the option “includes” and I have to put multiple contains filter to replace the includes option. Idea: To have the includes option for text fields in the rule action criteria to cover multiple “contains” values.
Give the ability to admins to configure segments filters at Global level in Adoption ExplorerPlanned
Hi Team, Posting this request on behalf our customer.Currently segment filters created at user level are hidden for other users making them to re-add the filters to see the data. It would be helpful if we could make the filters as sticky say for an instance like Global filters in Dashboard in gainsight. This gives admins more free hand to configure the AE for end user. Regards,Jagadeesh
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.