We have encountered this scenario multiple times, somehow we are solving it by creating number of tasks in a rule.For example for a customer we have to derive {[(Count of Cases Closed where Jira Issue ID != Null)/Total Cases Closed] . we had to write 3 tasks to do this . where as simple function inside case statement .For one customer we had to goon and write up-to 15 tasks.
Can we have functions inside case statement for a rule
None
Sign up
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Welcome to the Gainsight Community
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Even we got a scenario to compare the two columns from the source data set ,for that we have to create multiple transformation to acheive . If we find a solution that will be really help full.
Yes, it really helps us if we have a comparison of fields in our existed functions.
Case statement must allow us to do some calculations in it. Allowing us to say this or that is not an optimal Case statement scenario. This will significantly reduce the number of transformations in a rule. This is something really useful and really basic necessity.